TRIS Rating has assigned the company rating of Bor Ploi Solar Co., Ltd. (BP) at “BBB” with “stable” outlook. The rating reflects the company’s satisfactory performance, the predictable cash flows from its solar power projects, and an encouraging outlook for renewable energy as a way to meet the energy needs. These strengths are partially offset by BP’s brief track record as a solar power producer, the execution risks of the projects, as well as a high-leveraged capital structure to fund its growth opportunities.
The “stable” outlook reflects the expectation that BP’s solar plants will keep performing satisfactorily, without any significant replacement costs. The plant performance ratio should remain above 78%. The company is also expected to recognize sizable and sustainable annual cash flows, with EBITDA ranging from Bt280-Bt450 million annually over the next three years. BP is expected to successfully execute its upcoming projects in Thailand and abroad and earn satisfactory returns, without substantially deteriorating its capital structure.
The rating rise could occur should BP deliver remarkable success in expanding its core business amid tougher competition and lower tariffs on future projects. In contrast, downward pressure on the rating could emerge should BP fail to maintain satisfactory performance and build its track record, or if BP fails to generate sufficient cash flow, or if its capital structure deteriorates markedly.
BP was established in 2010 as a renewable energy company. In 2012, the company became a subsidiary of Eastern Printing PLC (EPCO), a leading provider of printing services in Thailand, after EPCO acquired BP from Inter Far East Engineering PLC (IFEC). In 2015, BP reorganized to focus on solar power projects in Thailand and aboard. Based upon the sizable contribution it makes to EPCO and the promising prospects for solar power, BP is considered a core subsidiary of EPCO.
The rating reflects the predictable cash flows BP receives from its solar power projects. BP, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, has secured long-term Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with the Provincial Electricity Authority (PEA) and the Metropolitan Electricity Authority (MEA). In 2012, BP launched the first two pilot solar farm projects in Kanchanaburi, with a total contracted capacity of 10 megawatts (MW). The two projects commenced operation in mid-October 2012. In 2013, BP added a solar farm project in Lopoburi province, with a contracted capacity of five MW. The project has been operational since February 2014. All BP’s solar farm projects operate under the purchase of power from Very Small Power Producer (VSPP) scheme, receiving a government-supported tariff adder of Bt8 per kilowatt hour (kWh) for 10 years.
During 2014-2015, the company invested in eight solar rooftop projects in Bangkok and Samut Prakan province, with a contracted capacity of 1.5 MW in aggregate. The solar rooftop projects have secured PPAs with the MEA and obtained a favorable feed-in tariff (FiT) of Bt6.55 per kWh for 25 years. The predictable cash flows from the solar power projects are hence partly substantiated by the contractually committed tariff and the minimal payment risk of the solar buyers.
The rating also incorporates BP’s satisfactory performance since its inception. As of June 2015, all of BP's solar farm and solar rooftop projects were in operation, with an aggregate contracted capacity of 16.5 MW. BP's average plant performance ratio was acceptable at 78%. BP's power output rose from 17.8 gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity in 2013 to 27.7 GWh in 2014, and 15.9 GWh in the first half of 2015. The output rose because BP added new capacity during 2013-2015. These solar power projects generated revenue of around Bt200 million per year during 2013-2014, and Bt180 million in the first half of 2015. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) margin are about 90% of total revenue. Given the existing capacity, BP’s solar power projects should generate 30-32 GWh of electricity per year or Bt300-Bt350 million in revenue per annum.
The rating takes into account the encouraging prospects for the use of renewable sources of energy in Thailand, chiefly evidenced by the government’s concrete long-term plan to develop alternative energy sources, the support given to producers of solar power, and the steady growth in energy consumption. On the opposite end, the rating is partially offset by the limited performance record of BP’s solar power projects, notwithstanding the use of proven photovoltaic (PV) technology. To ensure a sustainable output performance over the long haul, a solar power plant must be well-designed, use proven technology and certified equipment, operate efficiently, and employ timely maintenance practices. BP’s performance on these dimensions is yet to be proven.
The rating is also constrained by execution risks. BP must manage the execution risks in its current and forthcoming projects. Example of execution risks are the availability of manpower and equipment to supervise and monitor the power production sites, technological risk which may rapidly change the cost structure, more competitors as a result of limited barrier to entry, regulatory issues such as the tariff scheme and the government subsidies, as well as country risk inherent in operations aboard.
The rating is further tempered by a high-leveraged capital structure to fund BP’s growth opportunities. BP plans to invest in solar power projects in Thailand and Japan. The large-scale investments will put pressure on its financial profile during 2015-2018. The company plans to invest in solar farm projects in Japan, with a total capacity of 48 MW. The total cost of the new projects is Bt5-Bt6 billion, with construction spanning 2016-2018.
TRIS Rating’s base-case forecast expects BP’s operating margin (operating profit before depreciation and amortization as a percentage of revenue) should stay in the range of 85%-90% during 2015-2018. A solar power project typically has a high operating margin because of a government subsidy in the form of a tariff adder and low operating expenses. The electricity tariff for BP’s solar farms comprises three components: the time of use (TOU) tariff, the Ft (Fuel Adjustment Charge), and the adder. All of BP's solar farms obtain a favorable electricity tariff of approximately Bt11.5 per kWh. The solar rooftop projects secure an FiT of Bt6.55 per kWh. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) is forecasted to range from Bt280-Bt450 million per year. Funds from operations (FFO) are expected at Bt230-Bt350 million per annum.
BP’s total debt to capitalization ratio was 56.8% at the end of June 2015. The ratio decreased from 68.8% in 2014 as BP repaid some loans. FFO to total debt ratio stood at 26% as of 2014 and 27% in the first half of 2015. During 2015-2018, TRIS Rating’s base-case scenario expects BP’s contracted capacity will reach 50-55 MW and the performance ratio will be 75%-78%. The amount of electricity produced in the base-case scenario is expected to range from 80-85 GWh per annum. Revenues are expected to range between Bt300-Bt500 million per annum, with EBITDA of Bt280-Bt450 million per year. However, EBITDA is expected to gradually decline as the adder scheme starts to expire from 2022 onwards. During 2015-2018, the debt to capitalization ratio is expected to rise to 70%-75% as BP borrows to fund its investments.
TRIS Rating Co., Ltd./www.trisrating.com Contact: santaya@trisrating.com, Tel: 0-2231-3011 ext 500/Silom Complex Building, 24th Floor, 191 Silom Road, Bangkok 10500, Thailand Copyright 2015, TRIS Rating Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, republication, further transmission, dissemination, redistribution, or storing for subsequent use for any purpose, in whole or in part, in any form or manner or by any means whatsoever, by any person, of the credit rating reports or information is prohibited, without the prior written permission of TRIS Rating Co., Ltd. The credit rating is not a statement of fact or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any debt instruments. It is an expression of opinion regarding credit risks for that instrument or particular company. The opinion expressed in the credit rating does not represent investment or other advice and should therefore not be construed as such. Any rating and information contained in any report written or published by TRIS Rating has been prepared without taking into account any recipient’s particular financial needs, circumstances, knowledge and objectives. Therefore, a recipient should assess the appropriateness of such information before making an investment decision based on this information. Information used for the rating has been obtained by TRIS Rating from the company and other sources believed to be reliable. Therefore, TRIS Rating does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any such information and will accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from any inaccuracy, inadequacy or incompleteness. Also, TRIS Rating is not responsible for any errors or omissions, the result obtained from, or any actions taken in reliance upon such information. All methodologies used can be found at http://www.trisrating.com/en/rating_information/rating_criteria.html.